Tag Archives: hate-speech

Ezra Levant | 2014 Sappho Free Speech Award

Share Button

World's-shortes-political-testAccording to The World’s Smallest Political Quiz, I am (a) Left / Liberal, and on most parameters I agree with this, except.. I often feel much more at ease in the company of (neo)conservatives.., like, for instance, Douglas Murray, or Mark Steyn.., both of whom are notorious free speech advocates..

I would have loved, therefore, to celebrate Future Day, March 1, in the company of another outspoken neo-conservative, – Canadian free speech crusader Ezra Levant, who was in town – (Copenhagen) – to receive this year’s Sappho Award, – “given to a person who has combined journalistic skill and fearlessness in uncompromising writings”

True, – neo-conservatives don’t care much for the welfare-state, – they frequently express an unsympathetic indifference towards inequality, – (although less so than Libertarians), – they are often climate-change deniers skeptics, – (and I couldn’t care less..), – so what is it about them I find so.. liberating, so uplifting..

Well, – I very much appreciate their provocative, rebellious impeccable manners and dedicated opposition to (soft..) totalitarianism, – their love of freedom, – their integrity, enthusiasm, rhetorical skills, i.e. sharp-wittedness and absolutely wonderful sense of humour.. – and these are just some of their virtues..

[ Hopefully, Conservative scumbag, Jacques Delacroix, is (not..) reading this.. :) ]

Anyway, hear Ezra Levant’s speech, below.

Probably 99 % of “offensive” statements are junk, but in that dump heap there is the occasional diamond.., and if you say any “hateful” words are now banned, you eliminate the possibility of progress that comes from breaking up the old order..
By definition, you need to “offend” the old order to bring in a new one..

Share Button

“Crimethink” double standards: U.S. bloggers Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer banned from entering the UK..

Share Button

crimethink_by_ktinoIn Saudi Arabia, –
they have the Committee for the the promotion of virtue and the prevention of vice..

In Canada, –
they have the quasi-judicial Human Rights Tribunal..

In England, –
they have anti-free speech “Jihadist”, Home Secretary Theresa May

I subscribe to the Danish Free Press Society’s RSS-feed, – (in Danish), – which keeps me updated  about developments around the world. I highly appreciate this service, and here are  the latest headlines: 

Hate speech provision in Human Rights Act struck down

 OIC – (Organization of Islamic Countries) – Opens Office in Brussels to Fight “Islamophobia” in Europe

Prominent / Controversial US bloggers, Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer banned from entering the UK

Douglas Murray, whom I greatly admire, writes:

According to the Home Office, if you are a non-Muslim and you make the following statement, your presence will be deemed ‘not conducive to the public good’ and you will be barred from entering the United Kingdom:

“It [Islam] is a religion and a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society. Because of media and general government unwillingness to face the sources of Islamic terrorism these things remain largely unknown.”

If, on the other hand, you are a Muslim and you say the following, then the UK government has no problem with you, and you can come into the UK to do a speaking tour:

“Devotion to Jihad for the sake of Allah, and the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honor for the believer.”

A gross double standard over hate speech

Point is: What qualifies as “hate-speech” ? – and who’s to decide ?..

My personal opinion is very clear: I am completely against hate-speech laws, except for incitement to violence agaisnt specific individuals.

Share Button

Hitzb-ut-Tahrir and the poisoned pawn..

Share Button

I’ve been thinking for days about writing a post on the conference held by Hitzb-ut-Tahrir a couple of days ago at no other place than the heart of Danish Cultural Institutions, The Royal Library.
The Royal Library had been under a lot of pressure from the public and had also received a letter from the Culture Minister  himself, – (former Foreign Minister), – asking them to “rethink” their decision, which was based on the following reasoning: Hitzb-ut-Tahrir is a legal organization in Denmark, so they have the same democratic rights as everyone else to make use of the  prestigious facilities at the library and express themselves freely..

Now, – before I finish this story about Hitzb-ut-Tahrir and the status and fate of freedom of expression in our little kingdom, I should tell you, that this post will suddenly be turning into a game of chess..

I like to think of Denmark as being at the forefront of the battle for freedom of expression. However, the will to stand up for anyone’s right to express themselves freely regardless of the absurdity of the words expressed is being put to the test constantly. Just today, I believe, Lars Hedegaard, President of the local and International Free Press Society, is on trial for hate-speech against Muslims, and we are all holding our breath.., – is he really going to be convicted, while, at the same time, Hitzb-ut-Tahrir is arguing for the Khaliphate, and more or less directly inciting to kill Danish soldiers in Afghanistan, at the Royal Danish Library ?!

Of course this “conference” has outraged a lot of people, and a counter-demonstration was arranged. Personally, I don’t find these lunatics worthy of all the attention, but lo-and-behold, not one, but EIGHT ministers turned up at the demonstration:

Danish Culture Minister Bertel Haarder

I guess they must consider Hitzb-ut-Tahrir to be a real threat to democracy and basic human rights..

(Picture copied from Semit.dk

I find this slightly hysterical myself, although the group has gathered as many as 1000 + supporters at earlier demonstrations, but my opinion is, that even if they did pose a real threat, I would still defend their right to express themselves freely !

As far as I’m concerned, they can ALL express themselves freely, – Orthodox Islamic, Christian, Jewish lunatics, scientologists, conspiracy theorists, far- left utopists, nazis, nihilists, holocaust-deniers.., – (yep, even those too !), Ahmedinedjad, Chávez.. # ; – )    , – and continue the list yourself…

Thank God then, that the director of the Royal Library had the guts to stand up for the rights of this  un-democratic organization that we totally despise, – only then can we honour the attitude of Voltaire:

I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it

Well then,  I hope to have stated my position clearly, which was my main objective, but I wish I could have written about this event more extensively, – I think it deserves it, as it appears to be a critical time for all of us, when it comes to the fate of our basic human rights, especially the right to express ourselves freely..

But somethin’ else got in the way, that has also got to do with “position” and culture, namely the yearly  Chess Tournament at wijk aan zee. I’ve spent quite a bit of time following some fascinating games, one of the best being the game played yesterday between world’s highest ranking, – Norweagan wunderchild Magnus Carlsen and American /Japanese  Hikaru Nakamura, who up to that point was leading the Super-Grandmaster Group ahead of reigning World Champion, Indian  Viswanathan Anand.

So I’d like to entertain any chess-fan with this position from the game: (Carlsen is white.)

Poisoned pawn..
– black to move: Should black
Queen grab the pawn on d5.. ?

The game continued:

28….   Qxd5 ??
29.Bxh6 !!  gxh6
30.g7 Be7
31.Rxh6 Nf7
32.Qg6 Nxh6
33.Qxh6 Bf6
34.Qh8+ Kf7
35.g8Q+ Rxg8
36.Qxf6+ Ke8


Solution to Carlsen – Anand: World Chess Championship 2013 – WarmUp.. :

33… b4 !                                               ( 33.. h4 ??    
                                                                                     34. b4 cxb4 
34.axb4 cxb4                                          35. axb4 Kf5 
 35. cxb4 h4                                                          36.Kf3 Kg5 
36. Kf3 Kd4                                                           37. Kg2 Kg4 
37. Kg2 Kxd3                                                        38. Kh2 h3 
38. Kh3 Kc3                                                           39. d4 Kh4 
39. Kxh4 Kxb4                                                    40. d5 Kg5 
40.Kg4 a5                                                              41. d6 Kf6 
41. Kf3 Kxb3                                                        42. d7 Ke7 

42. Ke2 a4                                                             43.Kxh3 Kxd7
43. Kf3 a3                                                              44. Kg3 Kd6
44. Ke3 a2                                                              45. Kf2 Kd5 
45. Kd3 a1=Q                                                        46. Ke3 Kc4           
                                                                                    47. Kd2 Kb3 
0 -1          
                                                               48. Kd3 Ka3    
                                                               49. Kd4Kb3 
                                                                                    50. Kd3  


Share Button